the cool kids of youtube.com: delete your fb.com account...
join minds.com...
well? good thing i didn't do what they said...
i'm one of the first few to be banned
on this safe-haven of alt. free-speech commentators...
puppets: where: are: your: strings?!

so i revived an interest in Fb...
well... ask any Greek visiting Warsaw...
ask anyone not speaking English as their
primo: gehen zu...
no... only problematic english speaking
cool kids...
everyone else seems to have adopted
some sort of etiquette...
the english natives are just plain...
plain fuck annoying...

you really went against the sort of people that made the internet fertile... msm.chatrooms? msn or whatever acronym h'american-spreschen it was to come to be... a/s/l? playing sims: spotting the hellish wormhole? the sort of people who didn't bother to gravitate the internet, properly, left the "rest of us" semi-thinking, what the hell did we do right, that these retards did wrong? oh, right... they did that: they passed on their genes: just so their offspring would make the same mistakes they did, in order that they might feel better about their naive-tendencies that would never border upon suicide and that that exponential eroticism of insects... herded cow herds of satiated expectations of: non-existing expectations, i.e. dependencies... i still listen to die krupps': im schatten der ringe with a german fertish: i can't help it! :wumpscut bunkertor sieben... most notably thorns... i figured something more transcending than the meaning of life: a meaning of life has to accommodate the individual... ii figured the transcending aspect of life as per se: meaning-in-and-off-itself... no, you're not hallucinating, it's off not of: matthew implies: gift of god, not from or off god... a lightbulb is a gift of, a river is a gift of, heroin is a gift of, the polyverse correlation of gifts, of which god is not despondent of... gravitating toward cohesion: a cohesive pointer dubbed: double negation (0, 0) - the double negation pointer... one divine intervention is enough, a second divine intervention? am i a biological creature, or a zoological creature... anticipating a second divine intervention: the english sod-lot came ready... c.c.t.v. famous people of the vierte reich... no... i quiet liked the first intervention of the submissive hebrews becoming the: HERRSCHER von der WELT! a second coming would bring? dodgy pyramids... well: we have the economic schemes: so? there's not point "waiting"... ist da?! as i might labour beneath a trauerneiche... kindischbirke... schwebenkieferurnevonleier: zu begleichen der befehle auf bestehen winde! i pray the irish do not recognise that i have a familiarity with anything concerning der deutsche... perhaps there's only one gott, but sure as shit, there's a parthenon of the winds... there is no one single, monotheistic concept of "wind"... is there?! there's the wind from the sahara... there's the wind from the arctic... via scandinavia... please! please! bullshit me further!

i cared to make precautions... (Fb's most pop poetry group):

Dear Ms. Wingate: i am considering joining a group you're a moderator of - Facebook Poetry Society - yet i am daunted at the prospect - i have had several bad experiences at other websites, where the rule of the mob chased me off like a leper, notably wattpad.com, poetfreak.com, minds.com (well they shadow-banned me), so i figured, since i've been on Fb since its earliest days: 2007 - when you still had to sign up using a university studen e-mail account - i'd hate to be reported for some "micro-agression" / misunderstanding, which i can posit in all the given instances as petty jealousy... hence this precautionary stance on my part - i will not join a group (even with the decision being one of pending) if i am to except some foul play... it would be a breath of fresh air to explore at least one Fb community, but i do not want to put into jeopardy my library of outpourings... hence i thought it sensible to message a moderator rather than an admin to request: a feel for the sort of audience and the sort of contributors to the group. i can accept genuine criticism - i can entertain a dialectic - but i cannot entertain someone running to third party sources - i.e. if a problem is not maintained by either an admin or a moderator and has to receive "special status" concern that would bring in a... let's say: a Fb ombudsman... i would like to know up-front, before i "might" fall into a pit of: walking on eggshells... in all honesty: and i hope by the language i am currently employing i come across as someone reasonable... yet i have to state that within my own "creative" writing i employ the technique of personae, namely some of the personas i expose can become alter-egos... and these? well... the whole leper analogy of being forced out of the websites stated - can i have some guarantee that i might sometimes employ a persona non grata tactic? can a persona non grata deviation be allowed? i can assure you: in conversation i am very much in approval of the first rule: r.e.s.p.e.c.t.: but i can't guarantee "respect" with regards to writing about abstract people - or, quiet literally: people who don't exist. i look forward to your reply, before i consider joining this group

p.s. if you visit my profile page you'll find that all my posts are made public - i'm pretty sure you can give me your opinion as to whether this content could agitate anyone in the group who might bypass containing an dialectic within the admin / mod confines and run straight to an Fb ombud - so before i "might" agitate anyone within this group, i'd much prefer to seek your opinion - i'll happily not join if by joining i might lose my oeuvre.

this is the language of cordiality...
enclosed within is at least one persona non grata,
my alt-ego...
it is so debilitating having to explain
to someone that such dimensions do exist:
a square is an aspect of a cube...
but, evidently no,
i'm throwing darts at a bulls-eye...
and all i'm having to reciprocate are
retarded inhibitions that allow
themselves to overflow into
the realm of: keeping an unsound knowledge
of the formal nature of the confined to solitary
echoes of their own voice:
without chamber, in the communal
aspect of: the extended "comments" section...
as if by magic:
everything becomes frivolously conscripted
to some variation of:
extended familial informality...
sure... while modestly acquainted
in that antiquated sense...
of what could possibly become a:
pen-pal exchange that runs itself dry after
3 months...

surely a poet can become a persona non grata
in his compositions,
in the same way that a novelist
churns out characters,
and settles down for being the pawn-broker
puppeteer...
but? from my experience?!
apparenty no!
i can't have a 1st person 1st person osmosis...
i can't play the persona non grata without
a narrator's clarification...
do some people really require
a 'he said' / 'she said' after every fucking
sentence?!
the divine hive of the wasp mentality
is already agitated...
this is but one example of what's to be
expected:
to have the capacity for language
to do what: I WANT...
and not the incapacity for language
to do what: IT WANTS...
it and the plural of want:
i.e. someone else...
you come into
my sandpit... you play by my bucket &
spade rules...
you're guaranteed it's going to be a
game in english...
but that's about it...
no other rules are guaranteed;
savvy?